118 - Utilization of Vasopressin and Norepinephrine in neonates with cardiorespiratory compromise: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Canada

Poster Number: 118
Publication Number: 118.2105

Background: Data regarding neonatal clinical experience with Vasopressin (VA) and Norepinephrine (NE) are limited to small studies. The lack of large-scale studies with safety and efficacy data is preventing the widespread adoption of these agents.

Objective: To describe epidemiological data on utilization of NE and VA in neonates including their indications, effectiveness and overall outcomes across 3 tertiary Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) in Canada.

Design/Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved neonates who received NE or VA between January 1, 2015-December 31, 2020 at 3 tertiary NICUs. Data regarding demographic information, indications of use, dosing details, and clinical outcomes were described using mean, standard deviations (SD), frequencies and percentages. When appropriate, a comparative analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U tests or the chi-square test as appropriate. Post-initiation changes in physiological variables and laboratory parameters over time were analyzed using repeated measure ANOVA.

Results: 133 neonates (VA:70, NE:63) were included in this study. Baseline demographic features, clinical characteristics at initiation, indication of use, dosing details and clinical response in neonates exposed to both agents are summarized in Table 1. VA was commonly used for oxygenation failure due to persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN), while NE was commonly used for hypotension due to septic shock. NE was frequently used as a 1st line inotropic agent, whereas VA was used more as an additive agent [30 (47.6%) vs 12 (18.6%); p= < 0.001]. During treatment, lower sodium levels were recorded in the VA group vs the NE group [126.5 (8.6) vs 132 (7); p=.035], but other safety parameters were similar. The time to reach predefined stability parameters were similar in both groups. Significant improvement in physiological parameters were seen over time with both agents (Figure 1). Mortality within 7 days of use was high in the cohort, but comparable between VA and NE groups [18 (25.7%) vs 22 (34.9%), p=0.206]. Other neonatal morbidities were comparable between groups (Table 2).

Conclusion(s): This multicenter study provides pragmatic insights into the current use of NE and VA in neonates. Our study reports the effective use of each agent in distinct patient subgroups. This cohort represented neonates with high illness severity; however, exposure to either agent did not independently increase the risk of mortality or adverse outcomes. Further prospective studies exploring its optimal use and cardiopulmonary effects would be interesting.